Friday, July 13, 2007

When I first started posting the comely mugshots of selected arrestees from Des Moines' Polk County Jail (h/t State 29 ), I had no idea so many readers shared my fascination with caged pulchritude. To commemorate the anniversary of this popular feature, I think it's finally time to select the official Hawkeye Hoosegow Honey of the Year. But make no mistake: this will not be a beauty-only pageant. It is affiliate showcase mportant that the winner be well-rounded, and that is why I have added a talent portion to the program. In addition to the raw votes she receives from readers, each candidate will receive 1 bonus point for every $100 in bond set by her assigned magistrate. So please review the cavalcade of incarcerated corn country cuties, and vote for the one that sets your heart a-twitter. If you'd like more information on the candidates, Google "Hoosegow Honey" or simply rifle through the archives. Voting closes Friday July 7. Good luck, and may the best gal win! Left-Right, Top-Bottom: #1 Michelle, #2 Jesika, #3 Brandi, #4 Erica, #5 Jessica, #6 Ashley A, #7 Carmen, #8 Ashley B, #9 Becki, #10 Robin, #11 Tammi, #12 Rebecca, #13 April, #14 Megan, #15 Lacey

The natural rate of unemployment varies through time with structural change, demographic change, and so on. This report released today on existing home sales and recent reports on inventories are a reminder that a similar concept exists for homes and machinery. The vacancy rate in housing is similar to the unemployment rate in labor markets. Why isn't 0% unemployment for labor optimal? Some unemployment is optimal because it allows people to change jobs and allows new entrants to enter the labor market without a "double coincidence of wants." Without vacancies, to change jobs you would need to find someone who has the job you want and wants the job you have, and then trade. Those entering the labor market would have to find someone who is leaving the labor market and has an acceptable job, and they in turn must be acceptable vegas dice o the employer. The matching costs are high with such an arrangement. With some unemployment, costs fall since finding an offsetting match is unnecessary. Housing is no different. Without vacancies, to move from New York to Los Angeles would require finding someone moving in the other direction who has a house you are willing to buy and is also willing to buy your house, a difficult task (rentals would be similar). But with vacancies, the task is much easier. But what should the optimal vacancy rate be and what causes it to change? If the actual vacancy rate is below the natural rate, prices should rise.

When I first started posting the comely mugshots of selected arrestees from Des Moines' Polk County Jail (h/t State 29 ), I had no idea so many readers shared my fascination with caged pulchritude. To commemorate the anniversary of this popular feature, I think it's finally time to select the official Hawkeye Hoosegow Honey of the Year. But make no mistake: this will not be a beauty-only pageant. It is important that the winner be well-rounded, and that is why I have added a talent portion to the program. In addition to the raw votes she receives from readers, each candidate will receive 1 bonus point for every $100 in bond set by her assigned magistrate. So please review the cavalcade of incarcerated corn country cuties, and vote for the one that sets your heart share files -twitter. If you'd like more information on the candidates, Google "Hoosegow Honey" or simply rifle through the archives. Voting closes Friday July 7. Good luck, and may the best gal win! Left-Right, Top-Bottom: #1 Michelle, #2 Jesika, #3 Brandi, #4 Erica, #5 Jessica, #6 Ashley A, #7 Carmen, #8 Ashley B, #9 Becki, #10 Robin, #11 Tammi, #12 Rebecca, #13 April, #14 Megan, #15 Lacey

The natural rate of unemployment varies through time with structural change, demographic change, and so on. This report released today on existing home sales and recent reports on inventories are a reminder that a similar concept exists hobby or homes and machinery. The vacancy rate in housing is similar to the unemployment rate in labor markets. Why isn't 0% unemployment for labor optimal? Some unemployment is optimal because it allows people to change jobs and allows new entrants to enter the labor market without a "double coincidence of wants." Without vacancies, to change jobs you would need to find someone who has the job you want and wants the job you have, and then trade. Those entering the labor market would have to find someone who is leaving the labor market and has an acceptable job, and they in turn must be acceptable to the employer. The matching costs are high with such an arrangement. With some unemployment, costs fall since finding an offsetting match is unnecessary. Housing is no different. Without vacancies, to move from New York to Los Angeles would require finding someone moving in the other direction who has a house you are willing to buy and is also willing to buy your house, a difficult task (rentals would be similar). But with vacancies, the task is much easier. But what should the optimal vacancy rate be and what causes it to change? If the actual vacancy rate is below the natural rate, prices should rise.

In the June 28th edition of the Seattle Post-Intelligencer, columnist Joel Connelly talked about health coverage for children as part of his assessment of Governor Chris Gregoire. Included was a reference to the Children's Alliance Voices for Children Luncheon . Gregoire was greeted like a conquering hero when she recently gave the keynote address at the Voices of Children Awards luncheon, sponsored by the Children's Alliance. Of health care to children of illegals, she declared: "Being born newbie club n the U.S.A. means they are United States citizens. Period!" Read full column here.

The following shows some of the decisions the Canadian government is facing as sea otter numbers recover off the coast of British Columbia. The article skips around a lot, so I've moved a few paragraphs to try to give full version downloads t some sort of order. Sea otters once inhabited the Pacific Rim from Japan to Baja, Calif. They might have numbered 150,000 to 300,000 throughout their range before the commercial fur trade. Fewer than 2,000 remained in 1911, when the sea otter was protected internationally. Today, sea otters have bounced back to 150,000 in the Pacific Rim, occupying about half their historic range. ... The sea otter, well known for its dense fur and for floating on its back with its feet poking out of the water, disappeared from B.C. waters for decades due to excess commercial hunting in the 18th and 19th centuries. But between 1969 and 1972, 89 Alaskan sea otters were reintroduced along the west coast of Vancouver Island. Those sea otters multiplied in that area, due to rocks rich in shellfish. B.C. now has about 3,200 sea otters, with 2,600 off Vancouver Island and another 600 near the Goose Islands (the outer coastal waters near Bella Bella). Canada declared the sea otter endangered in 1978, and reclassified it as threatened in 1996. The population estimates above don't count the sea otters around Prince of Whales Island in neighboring Alaska...some of those otters frequent Canadian waters.

Link: Ensnared on the wireless Web - Los Angeles Times . In the hacker world, and con language, a honey pot is an attractive nuisance. It attracts computer users, who are then caught in a trap. One of the best reasons to pay $59 to $79 a month for EV-DO wireless broadband from Verizon is that you won't get caught in one of the fastest growing honey pot schemes: the fake wireless professor email otspot. As this L.A. Times article points out, many hackers are setting up fake hotspots near legitimate sites, with a small change in the SSID. For instance, when you sit down at Panera's, you may see several other nearby networks with names like Linksys, DLink, or other names. These may just be local yokels who aren't bright enough to change their SSID; or, and more often now, they are hackers who lure you in to their hotspot, and then mine your private data, such as credit card information. Read this article, and learn how to protect yourself. Or, better yet, sign up for EV-DO.

Click Here

The following shows some of the decisions the Canadian government is facing as sea otter numbers recover off the coast of British Columbia. The article skips around a lot, so I've moved a few paragraphs to try to give it some sort of order. best interest savings accounts ea otters once inhabited the Pacific Rim from Japan to Baja, Calif. They might have numbered 150,000 to 300,000 throughout their range before the commercial fur trade. Fewer than 2,000 remained in 1911, when the sea otter was protected internationally. Today, sea otters have bounced back to 150,000 in the Pacific Rim, occupying about half their historic range. ... The sea otter, well known for its dense fur and for floating on its back with its feet poking out of the water, disappeared from B.C. waters for decades due to excess commercial hunting in the 18th and 19th centuries. But between 1969 and 1972, 89 Alaskan sea otters were reintroduced along the west coast of Vancouver Island. Those sea otters multiplied in that area, due to rocks rich in shellfish. B.C. now has about 3,200 sea otters, with 2,600 off Vancouver Island and another 600 near the Goose Islands (the outer coastal waters near Bella Bella). Canada declared the sea otter endangered in 1978, and reclassified it as threatened in 1996. The population estimates above don't count the sea otters around Prince of Whales Island in neighboring Alaska...some of those otters frequent Canadian waters.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home